Carbon footprint estimation for tillage operations
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.56027/JOASD.192023Mots-clés :
Carbon footprint, quantification, tillageRésumé
As a larger use of agricultural machinery, the measurement of carbon emission is highly important. Quantification of the carbon footprint is important for the identification of more sustainable and environmentally friendly practices. Information about input energy (fuel energy) used by some tillage techniques was collected and converted into carbon. In order to use low emission tillage operations, the equivalent carbon emission factors of each tillage technique were determined. The carbon equivalents for using traditional tillage system were the highest comparing with other tillage systems (158.63 kg CE ha-1 and 55.63 kg CO2e ha-1), while No-till system which give (5.8 kg CE ha-1 and 5.45 kg CO2e ha-1). Improved conservation technology and management equipment can all help minimize the carbon footprints of farm machinery.
Références
Cema (2022). The role of agricultural machinery in decarbonising agriculture. https://www.cema-agri.org/images/publications/position-papers/CEMA_decarbonising_agriculture_27-04-22.pdf.
Edemilson, J., Graciele, A., Mesfin, M. and Thiago, L. (2020). Energy, carbon and water footprints on agricultural machinery. Biosystems Engineering ., 198, 304-322.
Federal Register (2010). Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards; Final Rule, 25, 330-407.
Khater, I., (2000). Comparison Study on Different Conservation Tillage Systems Under Conditions of New Reclaimed Soils. M.Sc. Agri. Eng., Dept., Fac. Agri. Zagazig Univ. Egypt.
Prabhat, K., Atul, K., Priyanka, T., Suryakant, K. and Narendra, S. (2022). Estimation of carbon emissions of agricultural machinery use in India. Oryza Vol. 59 ( 3 ), 260-268.
Lal, R . (2019). Energy and carbon budgeting of tillage for environmentally clean and resilient soil health of rice-maize cropping system. Journal of cleaner production 226: 815-830.
Lal, R . (2020). Identification of energy and carbonefficient cropping system for ecological sustainability of rice fallow. Ecological Indicators 115: 1-11.
Lombardi, M., Elisabetta, L., Caterina, T. and Roberto, R. (2017). Assessing the urban carbon footprint: An overview. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 66, 43-52.
Wu, X., Shan, H. and Shaojia, M. (2013). Carbon footprint model for evaluating the global warming impact of food transport refrigeration systems. Journal of Cleaner Production. 54,. 115-124.
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés JOURNAL OF OASIS AGRICULTURE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 2023

Cette œuvre est protégée sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Partage dans les Mêmes Conditions 4.0 International.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Plum Analytics
Artifact Widget
